10/24/2020 / By Ethan Huff
The walls are closing in on the Biden Crime Family after former Hunter business partner Tony Bobulinski announced at a press conference that he is handing over three smartphones’ worth of evidence to the FBI for potential investigation.
One of President Trump’s featured guests at the final debate, Bobulinski told the press right before the event that the former vice president was, in fact, directly involved in Hunter’s business dealings overseas, which included bribery schemes with communist China.
Bobulinski stated that when he was first introduced to Joe by Hunter, they had an hour-long meeting in which they discussed various money-making operations in foreign nations. It became clear to Bobulinski during this conversation that Joe was “plainly familiar at least at a high level” as to what his son was doing.
“Tomorrow, I will be meeting with Senate committee members concerning this matter and I will be providing to the FBI the devices which contain the evidence corroborating what I have said here tonight,” Bobulinski announced before refusing to take any questions from the press.
We have since learned that the FBI has agreed to interview Bobulinski, despite sitting on evidence implicating the Bidens since at least last December.
According to the FBI, it asked Bobulinski to hand over copies of the phones after learning about them. However, the Trump administration says it is the other way around, with Bobulinski and his lawyers having supposedly reached out to the FBI to request a meeting.
Meanwhile, the Senate Homeland Security Committee and the Senate Finance Committee, both of which have been investigating Hunter’s overseas business dealings, indicated that their own Friday morning meeting with Bobulinski has been postponed.
“I appreciate that the FBI has a job to do, and I am glad they are finally taking an interest in these concerning financial matters that our committees have been investigating for months,” stated Sen. Ron Johnson, chairman of the Senate Homeland Security Committee.
“I expect that Mr. Bobulinski will speak with our committee as soon as possible and fully share his insights into the Biden family’s business dealings.”
Bobulinski was a recipient of the incriminating email published by the New York Post in its damning exposé about the former vice president’s son.
This email, as you may recall, talked about a business arrangement between a Chinese company and various members of the Biden family. And according to Bobulinski, it is 100 percent “genuine.”
A particular note in the email states that “Hunter has some office expectations he will elaborate,” followed by a proposed equity split of “20” for “H” and “10 held by H for the big guy.”
“The reference to ‘the big guy’ in the much-publicized May 13, 2017, email is, in fact, a reference to Joe Biden,” Bobulinski confirmed in a statement to Fox News.
Though Biden’s tax returns supposedly show no personal business interests in China, according to Fox, Bobulinski, who heads Sinohawk Holdings, says it was actually “a partnership between the Chinese operating through CEFC/Chairman Ye and the Biden family.”
Responding to the allegations, the Biden campaign has said they are a “desperate, pathetic farce executed by a flailing campaign.”
“Joe Biden has never even considered being involved in business with his family, nor in any overseas business whatsoever,” Biden campaign spokesman Andrew Bates indicated in a statement.
“He has never held stock in any such business arrangements nor has any family member or any other person ever held stock for him.”
Contradicting the narrative is James Gilliar, another former business partner of Hunter who is currently a partner at Sinohawk. Gilliar reportedly told The Wall Street Journal that he is “unaware of any involvement at any time of the former vice president.”
“The activity in question never delivered any project revenue,” Gilliar added in defense of Joe.
Bobulinski insists, however, that Joe was, in fact, involved in Hunter’s overseas business dealings, and that he personally witnessed the interactions.
“I’ve seen Vice President Biden saying he never talked to Hunter about his business. I’ve seen firsthand that that’s not true because it wasn’t just Hunter’s business. They said they were putting the Biden family name and its legacy on the line,” Bobulinski insists.
Another email obtained by The Federalist‘s Sean Davis further suggests that Hunter, using his dad as cover, procured a $5 million interest-free loan for the Biden family back in 2017. Incremental payments of this loan were then transferred over the course of a year to Hunter’s firm.
“I realized the Chinese were not really focused on a healthy financial ROI,” Bobulinski says about the nature of the Bidens’ relationship with communist China.
“They were looking at this as a political or influence investment. Once I realized that Hunter wanted to use the company as his personal piggy bank by just taking money out of it as soon as it came from the Chinese, I took steps to prevent that from happening.”
Despite proving Joe to be a bald-faced liar, all of this and more is merely a “smear” effort, according to the Biden campaign, which is desperately trying to shift attention back onto Trump and his tax returns, or Trump and Russian collusion.
More of the latest news about the Bidens and the upcoming election can be found at Trump.news.
Sources for this article include:
Tagged Under: Biden, CEFC China Energy Co., China, communist China, corruption, deep state, Delaware LLC, emails, evidence, FBI, hunter, Hunter Biden, James Gilliar, Joe Biden, left cult, New York Post, Rob Walker, Sinohawk Holding, the big guy, Tony Bobulinski, treason, whistleblower
COPYRIGHT © 2020 CommunistChina.News
All content posted on this site is protected under Free Speech. CommunistChina.News is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. CommunistChina.News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and service marks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.